What are the examiners thinking about the ToK Essay in 2023 ?
The Theory of Knowledge (ToK) Subject Report is written by examiners after each exam session, it is a reflection on what examiners have seen in the work submitted for the exam session. The report includes details on common mistakes made, and recommendations for avoiding those mistakes in the future. As such the ToK Subject Report is the most definitive document for understanding “what the examiners want”. I strongly recommend close reading of the TOK Subject Report for all ToK teachers. The ToK Subject Reports can be found in the Programme Resource Centre of MyIB.
In this blog post I summarise some of the pertinent and interesting points about the ToK Essay arising from the May 23 ToK Subject Report. I will publish a similar post about The Exhibition in a couple of days. I have written similar posts about previous ToK Subject Reports in the past (linked & linked).
What do we learn about the ToK Essay from the May 23 ToK Subject Report ?
1. Students need to address all parts of the prescribed title. Don’t ignore parts of the question, this affects coherence of the answer (top of P5.)
2. Precise and direct reading of question is important (e.g Q2 M23 “For artists & natural scientists” many students did not consider artists & natural scientists, they just considered ‘for the general public’.).
3. A stepped approach to build an argument is most effective for complex essays that contain multiple elements (eg #4M23: "Do you agree that it is "astonishing that so little knowledge can give us so much power" (Russell)? Discuss with reference to the NS & one other AoK"). This essay requires students to deal with each element in turn, and to develop knowledge arguments relating to each. Contrasting claims / counterclaims / evaluation points are particularly important in complex essays (eg #4 M23, bottom of pg 6/top of 7).
4. Visual representations (eg charts & graphs) are now appropriate in ToK essays (Essay 5 M23).
5. Focus on writing a critical exploration of the PT (the driving question) rather than on a descriptive essay. A critical exploration includes:
Arguments supported by examples
Implications
Awareness of & evaluation of different points of view.
Limitations of arguments
6. Use of “points of view” rather than counterclaim. Points of view allows for a more nuanced range of points than a counterclaim. Points of view do not necessarily contradict, nor cancel out, the initial claim.
7. Examples should be explicitly connected to the knowledge argument and shown to justify a point.
8. Examples drawn from the student’s own studies, or own life, generally make better examples because it is easier for the student to analyse them and to understand the implication of the example (para 3, Pg 8).
9. AoK History should consider:
The history of events that are at least 10 yrs old.
The history of events that have been investigated by historians (rather than e.g. by journalists).
The process of the production of historical knowledge rather than the event itself.
10, Geography & Economics are often used well as Human Science disciplines.
11. The Planning & Progress Form is of increasing importance as an academic integrity check given the growth of AI etc.
OK - this is just a very brief summary of some of the main points. Some of these points are included because they are surprising, or new, to me. If you want more details on the subject report I recommend downloading it from the Programme Resource Centre. A similar summary of points about the ToK Exhibition in the May 23 Subject Report will be out soon.
Stay ToKTastic,
Daniel, Lisbon Feb 24
Watch this post as a video: